Smart contract development and independent audits
Build and secure your smart contracts.
Describe your project once. Vetted developers quote against the same specification, then an auditor with no link to your developer reviews the code.
- Free for clients
- No commitment until you choose
- Independence enforced by the platform
ERC-20 token with vesting
Specification
Approved, v1.2
Development quotes
3 comparable quotes
Developer
Company A
Develops and fixes
Code handed over for audit
Independent auditor
Company B
Separate audit quotes
Never the same company
Deployment
Fixes re-audited, final report
What the platform commits to
Each commitment describes how the platform works, not a marketing promise.
One brief
You describe the project once. The AI drafts a specification that every vendor quotes against.
Comparable quotes
Price, timeline, scope, team and post-audit fixes, in the same format for everyone.
Enforced independence
A company engaged to build your code can never be invited to audit it.
AI on the buyer's side
It flags scope gaps and unusual prices and explains the trade-offs. It works for the client only.
The independence rule
The one who builds is not the one who audits.
Development and audit are two engagements held by two different companies. The code is handed over once delivered, the report comes back, and the auditor checks the fixes again.
How the rule is enforced
A company holding a development engagement on a project can never be invited to, or engaged for, its audit or re-audit. And an audit firm engaged on a project cannot then be engaged to develop it. The database itself refuses it.
Enforced in the database, for every write, including the platform's own tools.independence_rule
Diagram of a typical engagement between a developer and an independent auditor
Your project
One shared specification
Development
Company A
Audit
Company B
Separate companies
Step 1, Development, Company A
Builds the contracts from the specification
Company A to Company B: Delivered code, frozen at a commit
Step 2, Audit, Company B
Audits the delivered code
Company B to Company A: Audit report and findings
Step 3, Development, Company A
Fixes the reported findings
Company A to Company B: Fixed code
Step 4, Audit, Company B
Re-audits the fixes and issues the final report
Quote comparison
Every quote in the same format, side by side
This is what you see once vendors have answered your brief.
Project fileSC-0142
ERC-20 token with vesting
Fictional example- Blockchain
- Ethereum
- Type
- Token
- Budget
- €15,000–€25,000
- Target timeline
- 8 weeks
Scope
- 2 contracts (token and vesting)
- Unit tests
- Technical documentation
- Testnet deployment
| Vendor | Status | Price excl. VAT | Timeline | Team | Post-audit fixes | Observation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vendor 1 | Verified | €18,500 | 21 days | 3 people | Included | None |
| Vendor 2 | Verified | €16,900 | 28 days | 2 people | Included | None |
| Vendor 3 | Verified | €12,000 | 14 days | 1 person | Optional | Price to review |
Median of quotes received: €16,900Price range: €12,000–€18,500
How it works
From first brief to audited deployment
Five steps, always in this order.
- 1
Describe your project
A guided form in plain language: token, DeFi, NFT or tokenization.
Deliverable: Guided form
- 2
Approve the specification
The AI turns your answers into a specification that you review and approve.
Deliverable: Specification
- 3
Compare development quotes
Vetted developers answer in the same format. You choose.
Deliverable: Comparable quotes
- 4
Choose an independent auditor
Audit firms with no link to your developer quote the audit and the re‑audit of the fixes.
Deliverable: Audit report
- 5
Deploy with confidence
You go live with a final audit report you can publish.
Deliverable: Deployed contracts
For developers and audit firms
Qualified requests, structured answers
Every request arrives with a specification, a budget range and a target timeline. You answer in the common format and are compared on the same basis as other vendors.
- Clear briefs instead of vague ideas
- One response format for every request
- A commission only when a contract is declared on the platform
Vendor profiles are reviewed before they go live.
Illustration of a qualified brief and a structured answer
Qualified brief
Staking protocol
- Type
- DeFi
- Budget
- €30,000–€45,000
- Target timeline
- 10 weeks
- Scope
- 3 contracts, tests, documentation
Your structured answer
- Price excl. VAT
- €38,000
- Timeline
- 9 weeks
- Team
- 3 people
- Scope covered
- Full
- Post-audit fixes
- Included
Frequently asked questions
- How much does it cost clients?
- Nothing. The platform is free for clients, with no commitment until you choose a vendor.
- How is the platform funded?
- Vendors pay a commission when a contract is declared on the platform. Clients never pay the platform, and project payments do not go through it.
- How is independence guaranteed?
- A company engaged to develop a project can never be invited to, or engaged for, its audit or re-audit. The rule is enforced by the database, not left to goodwill.
- Who performs the re‑audit?
- The auditor. The developer fixes the reported findings, then the auditor checks those fixes. The two roles stay separate.
- How are vendors vetted?
- Before a profile is published, we check that the company legally exists, that the person registering it is entitled to represent it, and that its references can be verified: public audit reports, code repositories or delivered projects. Vendors must declare any conflict of interest. A profile is suspended if this information turns out to be inaccurate.
- Who operates smart‑contract.com?
- BME Consulting SARL, a company registered in Lyon, France. The platform is private and independent, with no link to any public authority. Its details are in the legal notice.
Describe your project once. Compare with confidence.
Get comparable quotes from vetted developers, then secure your code with an independent auditor.
Free for clients. No commitment.